tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6615285628064623043.post7401833691882819947..comments2024-03-27T22:06:35.339-10:00Comments on Dead Tree Edition: The Great Forest Certification WarD. Eadward Treehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01300353143826844617noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6615285628064623043.post-71110658802803726032009-09-21T07:06:18.617-10:002009-09-21T07:06:18.617-10:00Now that doubt of the system has been publicly pub...Now that doubt of the system has been publicly published and legally challenged what has been done to the creditability of SFI?<br /><br />Has the millions spent on auditors and certifying been wasted?<br /><br />Will the cost of certifying be refunded if the allegations are found to be legit?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6615285628064623043.post-15037568699064142342009-09-16T07:20:33.384-10:002009-09-16T07:20:33.384-10:00If we're being completely honest, it's not...If we're being completely honest, it's not really about how much overall certified content is in the product, but rather can my customer put a logo on it? I highly doubt the majority of end-users care if a product is certified "mixed sources" with a percentage claim or a credit system rating. The only must haves I hear is "I need to put a logo on it" and "what&#JDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6615285628064623043.post-19161995253794807512009-09-15T04:13:55.424-10:002009-09-15T04:13:55.424-10:00this is a desperate attempt by forest ethics. for ...this is a desperate attempt by forest ethics. for most of us in north america, it's not SFI vs. FSC. it's how much overall certified content (and chain of custody certification) can be in the products you buy, which includes getting many small private landowners to be certified as well.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com